AAVSO: American Association of Variable Star Observers
Login

Proposal #493

Proposer (37223) Andre Kovacs (andre.kovacs@gmail.com) obscode: KADB
Assigned To(3663) Dirk Terrell
Date SubmittedMarch 14, 2024
StatusAllocated
PriorityNormal
Proposal

Dear AAVSONet Telescope Allocation Committee,

As part of the PLATO benchmark eclipsing binaries initiative and also member of AAVSO, I would like to propose the observation of eclipses for the detached eclipsing binary EPIC 212822491, using the Optical Craftsman 0.61m Telescope (OC61), located at the Mount John University Observatory (MJUO), via the AAVSONet.
The PLATO (PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars) is the third medium-class mission in ESA's Cosmic Vision program. PLATO was adopted by ESA Science Programme Committee in June 2017 and is due to be launched in 2026. Its objective is to find and study a large number of extrasolar planetary systems, with emphasis on the properties of terrestrial planets in the habitable zone around Sun like stars. PLATO has also been designed to investigate seismic activity in stars, enabling the precise characterization of the planet host stars, including its age.

The PLATO benchmark eclipsing binaries initiative, conducted by the PLATO Benchmark stars work package (WP 125 500) of the Determination of Stellar Parameters work package (WP 125 000), as part of the Stellar Science work package (WP12) (https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/physics/research/astro/plato-science/resources/psmdocuments/plato-uwa-psm-wbs-0013_i4.0_wp120000_stellar_science_structure.pdf), has as one of its main objetives the coordination of benchmark observations for testing stellar models used by the PLATO mission, and for validation of the stellar parameters that will be provided in the PLATO mission data products (Gent et al. 2022).
The 20 detached eclipsing binary stars (DEBS) selected as targets for the benchmark show a total secondary eclipse with depths around 1 per cent and narrow eclipses (Maxted et al. 2023).
Observations in multiple filters of the secondary eclipse are needed to measure the flux ratio, in order to help improve the the accuracy and reliability of the effective temperature measurements for the two stars in the binary system. However, observations of the primary eclipse should also be useful for the analysis.

The observations of each eclipse must be conducted in high cadence using, using a par of photometric filters B and V (bright targets) or R and I (faint targets), in order to cover a complete ingress and/or egress of an eclipse plus some data before and after (~20 minutes) to measure the out-of-eclipse level and eclipse depth.

In addition, the 24" OC61 telescope is particularly required for these observations due to the following factors:
- The 24" OC61 telescope is well suited for this target in order to achieve the photometric precision required for this 21.05 ppt depth of the secondary eclipse and 11.8 V-mag star;
- The observability from the southern celestial hemisphere at the Mount John University Observatory is favorable for the target at -4.83° in declination, and its elevation at 1029 meters and Class 2 Bortle scale sky should be also helpful;
- The secondary eclipse duration of 3.64 hours, plus the required baseline observation of 20 minutes pre-ingress or post-egress, leads to a duration of at least 2.15 hours for the observing session of an ingress or egress event. According to the Dr Karen Pollard (Director UC Mt John Observatory), this should provide a good match for the climate variations at the New Zealand site, and should also help minimize the conflict with other observation activities currently in place.

Finally, the observations of EPIC 212822491 would require a high cadence alternating between the most suitable pair of filters, and having the integration time adjusted accordingly in order to achieve a SNR~500 (or ~2 ppt RMS), not to exceed an interval of 2 minutes between exposures and also having the minimum dead time between them as low as possible, in order not to impact the precision of the eclipse model fit to the data.
The following list of predicted eclipse observations are suggested for the next 120 days:
- 2024-04-12 08:38 (Session start time in UTC): secondary eclipse with 17% Moon illumination at 133˚ distance;
- 2024-04-19 09:42 (Session start time in UTC): primary eclipse with 83% Moon illumination at 45˚ distance;
- 2024-06-01 08:49 (Session star time in UTC): primary eclipse with 29% Moon illumination at 160˚ distance;
- 2024-07-07 06:55 (Session star time in UTC): secondary eclipse with 2% Moon illumination at 84˚ distance;

Cordially,
Andre Kovacs

Targets
Target RA (H.HH) Dec (D.DD) Magnitude Telescope Observation Frequency Expiration Date Proprietary Term
EPIC 212822491 13.738733 -4.82750 11.263–11.08 OC61 July 20, 2024 No

Comments

(4848) George Silvis — March 25, 2024, 3:01 a.m.

We'll start with shots to set the exposures for the final runs.
Please comment back here for adjustments

(37223) Andre Kovacs — March 25, 2024, 6:30 p.m.

Last month I received a few test exposures for TOI-216.02 (11.903 R-mag) using 120s integration time with the new QHY600 camera and Sloan r (SR) filter, and I estimated the SNR at ~2170.
So, the integration time for SNR~500 for this ~11.2 mag target might probably be around 60s for the Sloan r (SR) filter.

(37223) Andre Kovacs — March 31, 2024, 4:10 p.m.

I received the notification for the first set of test run, but the sky was probably cloudly at the time and no stars are visible on them.
Could you please reschedule this test run?

(4848) George Silvis — April 1, 2024, 2:08 a.m.

Yeah, the images are bad.
The project is set to try every day. I want to confirm the exposure before we hit the dates you requested.
OC61 is recovering from some tech problems: drive and camera. We're getting there

(37223) Andre Kovacs — April 1, 2024, 11:35 a.m.

I received another set of test images and this time the stars are now visible.
However, it seems that something went wrong with the pointing of the telescopes since the field observed (wcs computed coordinates) does not match the coordinates for the target (RA and DEC from the FITS header). I tried to redo the plate solving to check if it would be something with the wcs coordinates, but they look correct (centered at 13:32:52.85 -08:55:36.0 and not 13:44:19.44 -04:49:39.0).

(37223) Andre Kovacs — April 3, 2024, 12:32 p.m.

I received another set of test images with the wrong field pointing (centered at 13:32:52.85 -08:55:36.0 and not 13:44:19.44 -04:49:39.0).

(4848) George Silvis — April 3, 2024, 10 p.m.

We're working on pointing problems on OC61..

(4848) George Silvis — April 7, 2024, 6:06 p.m.

OC61 is still struggling with pointing problems..

(37223) Andre Kovacs — April 8, 2024, 11:55 a.m.

The pointing was much closer to the target on the most recent images from last night, now centered at 13:42:25.62 -05:00:56.36.

(4848) George Silvis — April 8, 2024, 2:29 p.m.

Closer, but target still not in FOV

(37223) Andre Kovacs — April 20, 2024, 2:43 p.m.

I just received another set of test exposures and the pointing is still a bit off (centered at 13:42:25.62 -05:00:56.36).
Another minor issue is the fact that the mininum ADU count for the images is at -500 (histogram mean value at ~7.5 ADU), which might indicate something going on related to the calibration procedure. I don't belive it's related to the zero point/dark level setting on the camera, since it's not clipping the histogram at the black end.

(4848) George Silvis — April 20, 2024, 8:53 p.m.

Pointing is better now.
I made a final tweak to get the mag 14 comp into the fov and push the target snr to 500.
But we missed the April target dates.
Once we verify these final changes we will then pause the project until the June dates

(37223) Andre Kovacs — April 21, 2024, 1:26 p.m.

Indeed, the pointing for last night's images was spot on, but the FoV is going to be very tricky with a long focal length. Maybe, we could try, instead, to center the FoV on one of the stars at 13:44:40.71 -04:48:02.4 and 13:44:39.28 -04:46:19.3, so we could try to fit both C4 and C2 on it?
The exposure times for B, V and SR look fine, with SNR ~650 for B, ~600 for V and ~630 for SR, but must be increased for SI with SNR ~350 (probably to ~40s for SNR ~500).

(4848) George Silvis — April 24, 2024, 5:21 p.m.

Shifted FOV so target and 3 comps available
Adjusted SI exposure

(37223) Andre Kovacs — April 29, 2024, 2:19 p.m.

The 40s of integration time for the SI filter looks good (SNR ~600), but the pointing did not move that much in DEC and the C2 is still not in the FoV (only C4 is visible).

Comments on this proposal are closed.